How do you make the decision?
How much do you think of yourself over the other person?
This is the Prisoners Dilemma in action.
Yagi Studio / DigitalVision / Getty
In this version, Prisoner A and Prisoner B are both charged with a crime and interrogated separately.
Each is given a choice between betraying the other or staying quiet.
Neither knows what the other will do, but the outcome depends on their combined choices.
This is the easy choice if they have little trust in the other person.
Why reduce their spending if they dont think their partner will abide by their agreement?
This is the trouble with many real-world examples of the Prisoners Dilemma.
He cites problems like deforestation, vaccination, and culture change to make his point.
A game where two players take more than one turn in succession is called an iterated Prisoners Dilemma.
In addition, there can be multiple players as well as multiple rounds.
According to Esmaeilpour, these versions of the game can model complexsocial interactions.
And Taylor gives real-life examples.
“Family members, leadership teams, joint ventures, countries.
However, one of the best strategies for a Prisoners Dilemma game with iterated rounds is called tit-for-tat.
The group identifies a shared topic requiringcoordinated action toward a goalthat benefits them all.
They ensure that each team member’s first action is cooperative, supporting that shared goal.
Moreover, the dilemma does not consider long-term relationships where issues oftrustand reputation play very important roles.
Wrapping Up
The Prisoners Dilemma has been used to study human cooperation for decades.
Your solution for the Prisoners Dilemma says a lot about how you see yourself and others.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
September 4, 1997.
Tobin J.The prisoners dilemma.
University of Michigan Heritage Project.
