This term references the all too normalized genderedemotional laboroccurring within many romances.
Specifically, it points out how emotional labor is often left to the female-identified party.
Wondering what this term looks like in the wild?
Cavan Images / Getty Images
The more we know, the better we fare.
Sometimes relationships can break down because one party feels they are doing more emotional work than the other.
How do I know this?Im a therapistwho speaks to dozens of people every week.
I have gathered plenty of informal data.
At the core of this relational breakdown is a communication breakdown.
Hermeneutic labor speaks specifically to emotional work.
What Does Hermeneutic Labor Look Like and Am I Suffering From It?
However, others may be curious if this applies to them.
Furthermore, theheteronormativelanguage used within this term may be off-putting.
This phrase accurately sums up the experience of hermeneutic labor.
It is the sense of feeling like youre working extremely hard and yet youre receiving no response.
Over time, this can breed a sense ofresentment, which can be a relationship killer.
Hermeneutic labor can not only challenge intimate relationships it can also challenge thefamily system.
It is the sense of feeling like youre working extremely hard and yet youre receiving no response.
But, what determined relationship quality was the experience of personal power which is highly subjective.
The key component to addressing hermeneutic labor is to enhance communication skills.
Seeking outcouples therapycan allow both partners to get support in communicating more effectively.
Another way to enhance communication is for both of you to use statements that focus on your feelings.
After anI feelstatementis used, the person who is listening should focus on reflecting back what they just heard.
In my experience, Ive noticedmen often seek out therapyat the urging of their partner.
Anderson E.Hermeneutic labor: the gendered burden of interpretation in intimate relationships between women and men.Hypatia.
2021;38(9):2653-2677. doi:10.1177/02654075211017
