It covers everything from descriptions of conditions to diagnostic criteria for eachrecognized disorder.
This method offers several advantages, such as standardization of diagnoses across different treatment providers.
But increasingly, mental health professionals are considering the drawbacks of the DSM, including the possibility ofoverdiagnosis.
F.Rdec / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 3.0
Some critics suggest that it sometimes medicalizes normal human experiences and is overly influenced by pharmaceutical interests.
It was designed for use by doctors and other treatment providers.
The DSM-I was the first of its kind, but experts agreed that it still needed work.
The DSM-II, released in 1968, attempted to incorporate the psychiatric knowledge of the day.
It was heavily influenced bypsychoanalytic conceptsthat were prominent at that time.
DSM-III
Published in 1980, DSM-III represented a radical change in the DSM structure.
Its goal was to improve thevalidityand standardization of psychiatric diagnoses.
It was the first version to introduce such elements as the multi-axis system and explicit diagnostic criteria.
Although the DSM-III was a pioneering work, real-world usage soon revealed its flaws and limitations.
Confusing diagnostic criteria and inconsistencies led the APA to develop a revision.
Some of these changes were based on changing societal norms.
For example, in the DSM-III, homosexuality was diagnosed as ego-dystonic homosexuality.
In the revision, this specific classification was removed.
The DSM-III-R, released in 1987, fixed many of the internal difficulties of the earlier work.
Some diagnoses were added, others subtracted or reclassified.
In addition, the diagnostic system was further refined in an effort to make it more user-friendly.
The DSM-5, published in May 2013, represented another radical shift in thinking in the mental health community.
Diagnoses have been changed, removed or added, and the organizational structure underwent a major reworking.
Previous editions went decades between revisions.
in an effort to be more responsive to research.
The American Psychiatric Association published this update in 2022.
Research Guidance
In addition, the DSM helps guide research in the mental health field.
Therapeutic Guidance
For the mental health professional, the DSM eliminates a lot of guesswork.
Being aware of its drawbacks is important for both patients and therapists.
Oversimplification
The latest round of criticism echoes a long-running debate on the nature of mental health.
Many critics of the DSM see it as an oversimplification of the vast continuum of human behavior.
Childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common example.
Such findings suggest that DSM-5 critiques suggested a considerable growth in overdiagnosis have been overstated.
Labeling and Stigmatization
Other risks involve the possibility ofstigmatization.
Some therapists take great care to avoid attaching labels to their clients.
But for a variety of reasons, a specific diagnosis may be required.
Criticisms of the DSM
The DSM is not without criticism.
Other critics have suggested that the pharmaceutical industry has had too much influence on revisions to the manual.
Critics note that 60% of DSM-5-TR task force members had direct ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
American Psychiatric Association (APA).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
5th ed, text revision.
Washington, D.C.; 2022.
Decker HS.The development of DSM-III.
In:Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
Oxford University Press; 2021. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.631
World Health Organization.ICD-10 online versions.
Cooper R.Understanding the DSM-5: stasis and change.Hist Psychiatry.
2016;6(1):5.doi:10.3390/bs6010005
American Psychiatric Association.Highlights of changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5.
Clarke DE, Kuhl EA.DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom measures: A step towards the future of psychiatric care.World Psychiatry.
2020;80:101889. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101889
Young G.Dsm-5: basics and critics.
In:Unifying Causality and Psychology.
2024;384:e076902.
doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076902
Kaczmarek E.How to distinguish medicalization from over-medicalization?Med Health Care Philos.
2015;14(2):237-239. doi:10.1002/wps.20233
American Psychiatric Association.Development of DSM-5.
American Psychiatric Association.DSM history.
